[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120504.091736.839941449020176796.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 08:17:36 +0200
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: tegra: Add Tegra AHB driver
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/4] ARM: tegra: Add Tegra AHB driver
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 19:41:35 +0200
Message-ID: <4FA2C34F.5060406@...dotorg.org>
> On 05/03/2012 10:05 AM, Hiroshi DOYU wrote:
> > Tegra AHB Bus conforms to the AMBA Specification (Rev 2.0) Advanced
> > High-performance Bus (AHB) architecture.
> >
> > The AHB Arbiter controls AHB bus master arbitration. This effectively
> > forms a second level of arbitration for access to the memory
> > controller through the AHB Slave Memory device. The AHB pre-fetch
> > logic can be configured to enhance performance for devices doing
> > sequential access. Each AHB master is assigned to either the high or
> > low priority bin. Both Tegra20/30 have this AHB bus.
> >
> > Some of configuration param could be passed from DT too.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c b/drivers/amba/tegra-ahb.c
> > +static u32 tegra_ahb_gizmo[] = {
>
> const?
Yes.
> > +static int __init tegra_ahb_module_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return platform_driver_register(&tegra_ahb_driver);
> > +}
> > +postcore_initcall(tegra_ahb_module_init);
>
> Can this be a module_init() instead of postcore_initcall()?
Since this driver configures prefetch size from AHB client devices,
it's better to make this driver available before other AHB client
drivers get ready. So "postcore_initcall()" seems to make sense if
there's no other better initcall.
> > +
> > +static void __exit tegra_ahb_module_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + platform_driver_unregister(&tegra_ahb_driver);
> > +}
> > +module_exit(tegra_ahb_module_exit);
>
> If so, all of the previous two quoted chunks can be replaced with just:
>
> module_platform_driver(tegra_ahb_module_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists