[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 19:50:01 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, horms@...ge.net.au,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/02] mach-shmobile: Emma Mobile EV2 - first shot
On Saturday 05 May 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > All the chips in there so far share a common ancestry and they all use a
> > significant subset of the same drivers shared with arch/sh: i2c-sh_mobile,
> > sh-dma-engine, sh_cmt, sh-sci, sh_tmu, intc, pfc and sh_clk. AFAICT, this one
> > uses none of those and apparently was developed by NEC before the merger with
> > Renesas.
>
> I see. So your opinion is that it may have more in common with the other
> ARM-based platforms?
Not with any one in particular, although there are a lot of similarities between
recent Cortex-A9 based designs. I just think it would be more logical to put the
files into a new mach-emma directory in the same way that every other family has
its own directory.
As I said, I don't mind if you share infrastructure with mach-shmobile, like
using the same mach/*.h header files, but if you end up sharing actual code,
it would be nicer to put it into some location where it can also be shared by
other platforms.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists