[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANtih+9byBuPQpsdRnAh3e8xH1QDz_8SxAC7sSv=-hSdaFQL8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 02:49:10 +0300
From: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lemp.com>, Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: Avoid contention on cpa_lock if possible
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com> wrote:
> From: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lemp.com>
>
> Some architectures (e.g. vSMP) do not require to serialize cpa, for
> instance, by guaranteeing that the most recent TLB entry will always be
> used.
>
> To avoid needless contention on cpa_lock, do not lock/unlock it on such
> architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shai Fultheim <shai@...lemp.com>
> [ido@...ery.com: added should_serialize_cpa, handled potential race, and
> reworded the commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
> ---
Ping?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists