[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c91e0ff-dc31-4f94-8008-33d8c3d3c8ef@email.android.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 16:48:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] broken TASK_SIZE for ia32_aout
Why not just make it illegal to make the system calls you don't care about then, to prevent any security issue?
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
>Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 13:51:30 -0700
>
>> No. The input layer exports pointers in structures on the
>> read/write paths, and bitmasks encoded in ASCII strings which depend
>> on sizeof(long). The stupid... it burns...
>
>So there has to be a hack in every userland application wherein we
>teach it no only about this issue, but add special code to teach it
>how to make 64-bit system call traps.
>
>FOR EVERY CPU TYPE?
>
>I'd rather wait for a newer less broken input API to be added, rather
>than go through the pain of having to support 64-bit system calls in
>32-bit apps.
>
>Nobody on sparc has noticed this yet, and I doubt anyone is going to
>care meanwhile.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists