[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336379095.2852.17.camel@fourier.local.igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:24:55 +0200
From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
<siglesias@...lia.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Staging: IndustryPack bus for the Linux Kernel
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 11:04 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > +int ipack_device_find_drv(struct device_driver *driver, void *param)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct ipack_device *dev = (struct ipack_device *)param;
> > +
> > + ret = ipack_bus_match(&dev->dev, driver);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return !ipack_bus_probe(&dev->dev);
>
> Wouldn't probe() return zero or a negative error code?
Yes. However, in case of the function called by bus_for_each_drv(), it
should return zero if you want to continue or nonzero value to stop the
iteration.
I considered that if the probe fails, we can try with the next driver in
the list. So, the returned value of probe() is negated.
I will fix the other things and send it again with other suggestions.
Thanks,
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists