[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqcWvJbGgaWt-5XvANH5zZiMXpZVZEQv4cWTr1XHdPu-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:29:23 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.magenheimer@...cle.com,
sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramster: depend on CONFIG_NET for sock_* functions
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:02 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Building ramster without CONFIG_NET would cause linkage issue due to missing
>
> I'd say s/CONFIG_NET/NET/
>
>> sock_*() functions in cluster/tcp.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> index 4af1f8d..8e334cb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> config RAMSTER
>> bool "Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem"
>> - depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM
>> + depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM && CONFIG_NET
>
> s/CONFIG_NET/NET/ again, I'd say. How was this tested?
Hm... ran the build again with the patch and noticed it stopped
complaining, but apparently it wasn't enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists