[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqdYGp=VqVr51kjKcWBm2mSezq+eDuxDjCX0wRA_KEPJdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:47:49 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.magenheimer@...cle.com,
sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ramster: depend on CONFIG_NET for sock_* functions
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:29 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:02 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> >> --- a/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ramster/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>> >> config RAMSTER
>> >> bool "Cross-machine RAM capacity sharing, aka peer-to-peer tmem"
>> >> - depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM
>> >> + depends on (CLEANCACHE || FRONTSWAP) && CONFIGFS_FS=y && !ZCACHE && !XVMALLOC && !HIGHMEM && CONFIG_NET
>> >
>> > s/CONFIG_NET/NET/ again, I'd say. How was this tested?
>>
>> Hm... ran the build again with the patch and noticed it stopped
>> complaining, but apparently it wasn't enough.
>
> Well, my guess is that the errors you ran into weren't displayed because
> a dependency on an undefined Kconfig symbol (like CONFIG_NET is) will
> always fail. Ie, your patch made "RAM capacity sharing" simply disappear
> from the build.
Yup, which is not what I meant to do :)
Sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists