[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+1xoqc+4Bjgmnjx5kzMGr1ShVs8mbNppjr3OMa__tcFEcGuAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:00:52 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
linux@...ik.name, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: don't try mounting device as nfs root unless type
fully matches
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, we'll try mounting any device who's major device number is
>> UNNAMED_MAJOR as NFS root. This would happen for non-NFS devices as well (such
>> as 9p devices) but it wouldn't cause any issues since mounting the device
>> as NFS would fail quickly and the code proceeded to doing the proper mount:
>>
>> [ 101.522716] VFS: Unable to mount root fs via NFS, trying floppy.
>> [ 101.534499] VFS: Mounted root (9p filesystem) on device 0:18.
>>
>> Commit 6829a048 ("NFS: Retry mounting NFSROOT") has introduced retries when
>> mounting NFS root, which means that now we don't immediately fail and instead
>> it takes an additional 90+ seconds until we stop retrying, which has revealed
>> the issue this patch fixes.
>
> Just wondering, which tree is commit 6829a048 included in? It
> does not appear to be mainline AFAICS.
It's 43717c7daebf10b43f12e68512484b3095bb1ba5 in mainline now.
Commit 6829a048 was from the -next tree (not sure which one of the
-next trees, but if you grab -next you'll see it there). I've prepared
this patch a while ago when it wasn't in mainline yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists