linux-kernel - Re: [ 57/75] exit_signal: simplify the "we have changed execution domain" logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1336355835.8274.262.camel@deadeye>
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2012 02:57:15 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ 57/75] exit_signal: simplify the "we have changed execution
 domain" logic

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> 
> commit e636825346b36a07ccfc8e30946d52855e21f681 upstream.
[...]

This and the following commit b6e238dceed36891cc633167afe7151f1f3d83c5
('exit_signal: fix the "parent has changed security domain" logic')
appear to be applicable to 3.2.y as well.  Should I queue them up?

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Hoare's Law of Large Problems:
        Inside every large problem is a small problem struggling to get out.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)