[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdar8OLHcBmm5cDT7S_V1dbLG0L5FXuvw0=bhEjkjz88Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:02:48 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:09:21AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 07 May 2012, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > + static void __init u8500_cryp1_hash1_init(void)
>> > + {
>> > + db8500_add_cryp1(&u8500_cryp1_platform_data);
>> > + db8500_add_hash1(&u8500_hash1_platform_data);
>> > + }
>>
>> This is actually not correct any more because of the
>> other changes: each device addition should also pass the parent
>> pointer so the device is created in the right position.
>>
>> Stephen, your fix is ok for linux-next and I expect everything
>> to still work, but we should not merge it into v3.5 this way.
>>
>> Thanks for the fixup.
>
> OK, I'll drop the last patch
>
> mach-ux500: crypto - core support for CRYP/HASH module
OK we need to revisit this and we can drop the U5500 hunks at
the same time.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists