[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336395782.27020.37.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 15:03:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf/x86-ibs: Add support for IBS pseudo events
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 20:26 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> +enum ibs_filter_type {
> + IBS_NO_FILTER = 0,
> + IBS_MATCH_FILTER = 1,
> + IBS_ANY_SET_FILTER = 2,
> + IBS_PSEUDO_EVENT = 0x0F,
> +};
I don't get how those pseudo events work, AFAIKT IBS_PSEUDO_EVENT causes
one to loose all events since it does have a filter set but fails the
filter and thus we skip the call to perf_event_overflow().
Furthermore, I think this filter stuff should accumulate the period so
that PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD still works correctly and reflects the number of
counts since the last sample.
Also, what's the point of filtering in-kernel as opposed to doing all
this in userspace? Is the amount of data 'saved' significant enough?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists