[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120507135524.GA30420@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 19:25:24 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, X86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@...rix.com>,
Virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V8 0/17] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> [2012-05-07 16:49:25]:
> > Deferring preemption (when vcpu is holding lock) may give us better than 1-3%
> > results on PLE hardware. Something worth trying IMHO.
>
> Is the improvement so low, because PLE is interfering with the patch, or
> because PLE already does a good job?
I think its latter (PLE already doing a good job).
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists