[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120507163400.GL17002@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:34:01 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: drivers: Probable misuses of ||
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > with no analysis
> You did elide the "Likely the || should be &&" preface.
By analysis I meant something like "...because X".
> > Compare this with the reports from people like Julia Lawall, for example
> > - they tend to be very clear. Even simply adding "...as with || they
> > will always be true" would've helped.
> I think it's a pretty basic logic error that most all
> lkml readers should be able to identify most of the time.
"Can spot" and "will spot" are two different things; speaking as someone
on the receiving end of lots of mails it does make a big difference.
Cues in the human written text which show someone thought about the
problem help a lot with catching attention - the more effort it takes to
understand a mail the more likely it is to get skipped, especially if
there's no patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists