[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120507.142143.172247040163546224.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:21:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, yinghai@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 10/10] mm: remove sparsemem allocation details from the
bootmem allocator
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 11:19:41 -0700
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:37:52PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> alloc_bootmem_section() derives allocation area constraints from the
>> specified sparsemem section. This is a bit specific for a generic
>> memory allocator like bootmem, though, so move it over to sparsemem.
>>
>> As __alloc_bootmem_node_nopanic() already retries failed allocations
>> with relaxed area constraints, the fallback code in sparsemem.c can be
>> removed and the code becomes a bit more compact overall.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>
> For 03-10
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks for doing this. While at it, maybe we can clear up the naming
> mess there? I don't hate __s too much but the bootmem allocator
> brings it to a whole new level. :(
+1 And you can add my Ack to this series too, thanks Johannes:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists