[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120507211612.GA19700@liondog.tnic>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 23:16:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86: kernel/microcode_core.c simple_strtoul
cleanup
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:35:15AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I'll pick it up. I presume I have your ack on it?
Yep, sure.
Btw, while at it, I gave the whole sysfs reload thing a critical look
and whether it is at all that useful - this thing gives you microcode
reloading on a single CPU. And what you actually wanna do is reload the
microcode on the whole system, i.e. all cores in succession.
And we don't use the reload thing on AMD, so I was wondering, if you
guys don't find it useful on Intel hw, maybe we can remove it completely
in favor of
$ rmmod microcode; modprobe microcode
which reloads the ucode on each core.
Of course, one can iterate over each core in a shell-loop and write into
the reload file to reload ucode after having updated the ucode image in
/lib/firmware but removing and then modprobing the module is shorter :-)
Hmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists