[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120507221706.GI22082@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 7 May 2012 23:17:06 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
	Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Speed up deactivate_super for non-modular
 filesystems
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:51:08PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> /proc and similar non-modular filesystems do not need a rcu_barrier
> in deactivate_locked_super.  Being non-modular there is no danger
> of the rcu callback running after the module is unloaded.
There's more than just a module unload there, though - actual freeing
struct super_block also happens past that rcu_barrier()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
