linux-kernel - Re: [ 57/75] exit_signal: simplify the "we have changed execution domain" logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 May 2012 17:31:25 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ 57/75] exit_signal: simplify the "we have changed execution
 domain" logic

On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:57:15AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:43 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > 3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > 
> > commit e636825346b36a07ccfc8e30946d52855e21f681 upstream.
> [...]
> 
> This and the following commit b6e238dceed36891cc633167afe7151f1f3d83c5
> ('exit_signal: fix the "parent has changed security domain" logic')
> appear to be applicable to 3.2.y as well.  Should I queue them up?

Yes, that would be good to do.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/