linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] edac: avoid mce decoding crash after edac driver unloaded

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FA8C44A.3070700@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2012 14:59:22 +0800
From:	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	mchehab@...hat.com, bp@...64.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] edac: avoid mce decoding crash after edac driver unloaded

...
> 
> <formletter>
> 
> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
>  stable kernel tree.  Please read 
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do this properly.
> 
> </formletter> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line 
> "unsubscribe linux-edac" in the body of a message to 
> majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at 
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

Hi, Greg

Do you mean I need to add some information in my patch as below:

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.3.y:
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.2.y: 3653ada: x86, mce: Add wrappers
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.2.y:


For 3.3.y, commit 3653ada has been there so it is not necessary. Is it
OK to send one patch to two -stable trees?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/