linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] irq_remap: fix the UP build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 11:09:45 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	joro@...tes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] irq_remap: fix the UP build failure


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> Fix the below UP build failure with CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP enabled.
> 
>  drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c:955:19: error: ‘struct irq_data’ has no member named ‘affinity’

hm:

> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#endif

Adding this many #ifdefs is a bit sad. Could we not make the UP 
side have the (supposedly zero length!) affinity cpumask 
instead, or so, and make sure that the SMP functions compile to 
something sensible on UP?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/