[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7dee31a0-7b89-418c-a69b-436729ba55b0@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 07:06:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH untested] virtio: allocate extra memory before the ring ( was Re: [RFC PATCH] virtio_console: link vq to port with a private) pointer in struct virtqueue
> And it's not a problem if virtqueue is exactly at start of
> vring_virtqueue: we just need to allocate a bit more at start, and
> offset when we free. Here's how I would do this: first apply patch
> below that adds the offset parameter, then update all transports, one
> patch at a time to not use priv pointer, finally you can repurpose
> priv pointer to let devices use it.
I like it, though I prefer to have the new arguments as sizeof()
rather than offsets.
I'll pick up this and test it.
> As a bonus we get small incremental patches.
FWIW, that's possible with the patch I posted too.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists