[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA8811C.6050300@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 20:12:44 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: acme@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Caspar Zhang <czhang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] perf, tool: Fix endian issues
On 5/7/12 5:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Tested by running following usecase:
> - origin system:
> # perf record -a -- sleep 10 (any perf record will do)
> # perf report> report.origin
> # perf archive perf.data
>
> - copy the perf.data, report.origin and perf.data.tar.bz2
> to a target system and run:
> # tar xjvf perf.data.tar.bz2 -C ~/.debug
> # perf report> report.target
> # diff -u report.origin report.target
>
> - the diff should produce no output
> (besides some white space stuff and possibly different
> date/TZ output)
>
> Tested by above usecase cross following architectures:
> i386, x86_64, s390x, ppc64
What version of ppc64? I'm getting 2 compile failures using Fedora 12
PPC, 32-bit. I sent a patch for the easy one with perf-report. I'm a bit
stumped on this one:
LINK /tmp/pbuild/perf
/tmp/pbuild/libperf.a(pmu.o): In function `pmu_format_parse':
/mnt/src/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:47: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_in'
/mnt/src/tools/perf/util/pmu.c:47: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_in'
/tmp/pbuild/libperf.a(pmu-bison.o): In function `perf_pmu_parse':
/tmp/pbuild/util/pmu-bison.c:1287: undefined reference to `perf_pmu_lex'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [/tmp/pbuild/perf] Error 1
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists