[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120508152843.GE8988@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 18:28:43 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC dontapply 5/5] kvm_para: guest side for eoi avoidance
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 05:26:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 23/04/2012 16:04, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > +/* Our own copy of __test_and_clear_bit to make sure
> > + * it is done with a single instruction */
>
> Is this for microoptimization or correctness? If the latter, it does
> not ensure anything without a "lock" prefix.
>
It can't race with other vcpus, only with vmexit on the same vcpu.
> Paolo
>
> > +static inline int kvm_test_and_clear_bit(int nr, volatile u16* addr)
> > +{
> > + int oldbit;
> > +
> > + asm volatile("btr %2,%1\n\t"
> > + "sbb %0,%0"
> > + : "=r" (oldbit), BITOP_ADDR_CONSTRAINT(*addr) : "Ir" (nr));
> > + return oldbit;
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists