[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120508184052.GA23748@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 20:40:52 +0200
From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, chatty@...c.fr,
chasedouglas@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Input: MT - Include win8 support
> > to aid in the discussion, I have shared a drawing of the MT model
> > and the (supposed) win8 model.
> >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KKu7kqPOsvE9tCmWhdGnmO8tgmN0Cd-Mv_crVaCZueY/view
>
> having an asciiart version of this in Documentation/ would be quite useful,
> IMO
Yep, that ought to be possible to arrange.
> Insert a paragraph into the actual documentation. I think that's more
> helpful than tacking it on (if not quite as nice in a diff)
>
> "The orientation of the ellipse. The value should describe a signed quarter
> of a revolution clockwise around the touch center. The signed value range
> is arbitrary, but zero should be returned for a finger aligned along the Y
> axis of the surface, a negative value when finger is turned to the left, and
> a positive value when finger turned to the right. When completely aligned
> with the X axis, the range max should be returned.
>
> Touch ellipsis are symmetrical by default. For devices capable of true 360
> degree orientation, the reported orientation must exceed the range max to
> indicate more than a quarter of a revolution. For an upside-down finger,
> range max * 2 should be returned.
>
> Orientation can be omitted if the touching object is circular, or if the
> information is not available in the kernel driver. Partial orientation
> support is possible if the device can distinguish between the two axis, but
> not (uniquely) any values in between. In such cases, the range of
> ABS_MT_ORIENTATION should be [0, 1] [4]."
Looks good, will copy that in its entirety. :-)
> Not a big fan of reporting values above absmin/absmax, tbh. It means we
> can't rely on the axis values and have to special-case it. Plus, there's no
> way to detect this before you actually get a value.
True, and I am open to other suggestions. However, I think the
proposal integrates pretty well with the existing model and is likely
to produce reasonable results without userland modifications.
> > Looking at the figure, it is clear that the MT model has two centers,
> > one for each ellipse. Thus, center is not discriminating
> > enough. Perhaps ABS_MT_OUTER_X/Y is more appropriate, then?
>
> ABS_MT_OUTER_CENTER
I appreciate the suggestion, but along two-word combinations,
ABS_MT_OUTER_POSITION would integrate better with existing names. Both
seem awfully long, though.
Thanks for your input!
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists