[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA9709F.6020700@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 12:14:39 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
Shane Wang <shane.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] x86, realmode: realmode.bin infrastructure
On 05/08/2012 11:53 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
+# How to compile the 16-bit code. Note we always compile for -march=i386,
+# that way we can complain to the user if the CPU is insufficient.
+KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(LINUXINCLUDE) -m32 -g -Os -D_SETUP -D__KERNEL__ \
+ -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
+ -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes \
+ -march=i386 -mregparm=3 \
+ -include $(srctree)/$(src)/../../boot/code16gcc.h \
+ -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer \
+ $(call cc-option, -ffreestanding) \
+ $(call cc-option, -fno-toplevel-reorder,\
+ $(call cc-option, -fno-unit-at-a-time)) \
+ $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) \
+ $(call cc-option, -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
+KBUILD_AFLAGS := $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -D__ASSEMBLY__
>
> How much is needed to avoid this misuse of kernel-internal build rules?
> This was and is an ugly hack.
>
It is more or less the same as for arch/x86/boot and other things. If
there are better ways to do it suggestions are very much appreciated.
However, it is a bit of a tricky bit because we need *some* of the bits
of the target compiler configuration and some not (this is the same as
arch/x86/boot etc.) It is not "pure target" but it's also most
definitely not host.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists