lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAZUjxBp7f_Tt3bXSOcac6RmeT23npELYO52P_2LdMN-MdH=7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2012 16:03:25 -0500
From:	wilson self <wself00@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Work queues and cpu isolation

I have done some reading on the subject of work queues and CPU
isolation, and specifically I've read a number of posts from Max K.
dating back to 2008 on the subject of CPU isolation.  However, I have
not seen much in the way of discussion on the subject in more recent
times, specifically in the 3.x kernels; where it appears there are
some significant differences in the structure of workqueue in general.

Is there anyone currently doing work on additional isolation of CPUs
from work queues? I have some requirement to further isolate cores on
a machine from these queues and am hoping someone here could point me
in the right direction.

Thanks.
wilson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ