[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1336519085-27450-1-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:18:02 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...e.hu,
oleg@...hat.com
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suresh@...stanetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper multi-threaded core dump
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:09 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 12:15 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Ugh, I hate this one.
> >
> > We're making the exit path more expensive for almost no gain. The FPU
> > state is dead in 99.9% of all cases.
> >
> > Why isn't this a core-dump-only case?
> >
>
> Today we do this unlazy_fpu() (which is what prepare_to_copy does)
> already as part of the first schedule() in the exit path. I am just
> making it explicit by calling prepare_to_copy() before exit_mm() which
> synchronizes all the threads before the first thread goes with the core
> dump.
>
> I don't think I am adding any more cost to the existing path, unless I
> am missing something.
My quick test confirmed my understanding. For example, mainline is
doing fpu_save_init() some 1770 times when a tsk is in the TASK_DEAD state,
during boot of a two socket system.
So based on your suggestion, made the first patch as core-dump only case and
added the third patch which clears the fpu state during exit.
thanks.
Suresh Siddha (3):
coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper multi-threaded core
dump
x86, xsave: remove thread_has_fpu() bug check in
__sanitize_i387_state()
x86, fpu: clear the fpu state during thread exit
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c | 2 --
kernel/exit.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
1.7.6.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists