[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120509055043.705902915@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 06:52:10 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, "he, bo" <bo.he@...el.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [ 101/167] [PATCH] sched: Fix OOPS when build_sched_domains() percpu allocation
fails
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "he, bo" <bo.he@...el.com>
commit fb2cf2c660971bea0ad86a9a5c19ad39eab61344 upstream.
Under extreme memory used up situations, percpu allocation
might fail. We hit it when system goes to suspend-to-ram,
causing a kworker panic:
EIP: [<c124411a>] build_sched_domains+0x23a/0xad0
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Pid: 3026, comm: kworker/u:3
3.0.8-137473-gf42fbef #1
Call Trace:
[<c18cc4f2>] panic+0x66/0x16c
[...]
[<c1244c37>] partition_sched_domains+0x287/0x4b0
[<c12a77be>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x1fe/0x210
[<c123712d>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1d/0x30
[...]
With this fix applied build_sched_domains() will return -ENOMEM and
the suspend attempt fails.
Signed-off-by: he, bo <bo.he@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1335355161.5892.17.camel@hebo
[ So, we fail to deallocate a CPU because we cannot allocate RAM :-/
I don't like that kind of sad behavior but nevertheless it should
not crash under high memory load. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: change filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7605,16 +7605,26 @@
struct sd_data *sdd = &tl->data;
for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map) {
- struct sched_domain *sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j);
- if (sd && (sd->flags & SD_OVERLAP))
- free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
- kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
- kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
- kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgp, j));
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+
+ if (sdd->sd) {
+ sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j);
+ if (sd && (sd->flags & SD_OVERLAP))
+ free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
+ kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
+ }
+
+ if (sdd->sg)
+ kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
+ if (sdd->sgp)
+ kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgp, j));
}
free_percpu(sdd->sd);
+ sdd->sd = NULL;
free_percpu(sdd->sg);
+ sdd->sg = NULL;
free_percpu(sdd->sgp);
+ sdd->sgp = NULL;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists