[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120509061621.GA32230@burratino>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 01:16:21 -0500
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...auone-net.jp>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [ 153/167] [PATCH] x86, relocs: Remove an unused variable
Hi,
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
[...]
> commit 7c77cda0fe742ed07622827ce80963bbeebd1e3f upstream.
>
> sh_symtab is set but not used.
>
> [ hpa: putting this in urgent because of the sheer harmlessness of the patch:
> it quiets a build warning but does not change any generated code. ]
[...]
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/relocs.c
> @@ -403,13 +403,11 @@ static void print_absolute_symbols(void)
> for (i = 0; i < ehdr.e_shnum; i++) {
> struct section *sec = &secs[i];
> char *sym_strtab;
> - Elf32_Sym *sh_symtab;
> int j;
>
> if (sec->shdr.sh_type != SHT_SYMTAB) {
> continue;
> }
> - sh_symtab = sec->symtab;
This patch is a no-op.
The explanation in brackets above makes perfect sense in the context
of mainline, but I don't think this belongs in stable.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists