linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FA9B7BF.90502@xenotime.net>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2012 17:18:07 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)

On 05/08/2012 04:37 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 16:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/08/2012 04:13 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 09:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 05/08/2012 01:15 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Build errors on i386 and x86_64 when CONFIG_PRINTK is not enabled:
>>>
>>> This seems to work for me.
>>
>> It still has one build error which was in the initial report:
> 
> Ah sorry, missed to add a hunk.

Still not fixed.

drivers/char/mem.c:858:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_emit'

	printk_emit(facility, level, NULL, 0, "%s", line);



> Thanks,
> Kay
> 
> 
> From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
> Subject: printk - fix compilation for CONFIG_PRINTK=n
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
> ---
>  drivers/char/mem.c |    2 ++
>  kernel/printk.c    |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/char/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c
> @@ -825,7 +825,9 @@ static const struct memdev {
>  	 [7] = { "full", 0666, &full_fops, NULL },
>  	 [8] = { "random", 0666, &random_fops, NULL },
>  	 [9] = { "urandom", 0666, &urandom_fops, NULL },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
>  	[11] = { "kmsg", 0644, &kmsg_fops, NULL },
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP
>  	[12] = { "oldmem", 0, &oldmem_fops, NULL },
>  #endif
> --- a/kernel/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(console_set_on_cmdline);
>  /* Flag: console code may call schedule() */
>  static int console_may_schedule;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
>  /*
>   * The printk log buffer consists of a chain of concatenated variable
>   * length records. Every record starts with a record header, containing
> @@ -208,16 +207,9 @@ struct log {
>   */
>  static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(logbuf_lock);
>  
> -/* cpu currently holding logbuf_lock */
> -static volatile unsigned int logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
> -
> -#define LOG_LINE_MAX 1024
> -
> -/* record buffer */
> -#define __LOG_BUF_LEN (1 << CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT)
> -static char __log_buf[__LOG_BUF_LEN];
> -static char *log_buf = __log_buf;
> -static u32 log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> +/* the next printk record to read by syslog(READ) or /proc/kmsg */
> +static u64 syslog_seq;
> +static u32 syslog_idx;
>  
>  /* index and sequence number of the first record stored in the buffer */
>  static u64 log_first_seq;
> @@ -225,15 +217,23 @@ static u32 log_first_idx;
>  
>  /* index and sequence number of the next record to store in the buffer */
>  static u64 log_next_seq;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
>  static u32 log_next_idx;
>  
>  /* the next printk record to read after the last 'clear' command */
>  static u64 clear_seq;
>  static u32 clear_idx;
>  
> -/* the next printk record to read by syslog(READ) or /proc/kmsg */
> -static u64 syslog_seq;
> -static u32 syslog_idx;
> +#define LOG_LINE_MAX 1024
> +
> +/* record buffer */
> +#define __LOG_BUF_LEN (1 << CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT)
> +static char __log_buf[__LOG_BUF_LEN];
> +static char *log_buf = __log_buf;
> +static u32 log_buf_len = __LOG_BUF_LEN;
> +
> +/* cpu currently holding logbuf_lock */
> +static volatile unsigned int logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
>  
>  /* human readable text of the record */
>  static char *log_text(const struct log *msg)
> @@ -1425,13 +1425,16 @@ asmlinkage int printk(const char *fmt, .
>  	return r;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(printk);
> +
>  #else
>  
> -static void call_console_drivers(int level, const char *text, size_t len)
> -{
> -}
> +#define LOG_LINE_MAX 0
> +static struct log *log_from_idx(u32 idx) { return NULL; }
> +static u32 log_next(u32 idx) { return 0; }
> +static char *log_text(const struct log *msg) { return NULL; }
> +static void call_console_drivers(int level, const char *text, size_t len) {}
>  
> -#endif
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PRINTK */
>  
>  static int __add_preferred_console(char *name, int idx, char *options,
>  				   char *brl_options)
> @@ -1715,7 +1718,7 @@ static u32 console_idx;
>   * by printk().  If this is the case, console_unlock(); emits
>   * the output prior to releasing the lock.
>   *
> - * If there is output waiting, we wake it /dev/kmsg and syslog() users.
> + * If there is output waiting, we wake /dev/kmsg and syslog() users.
>   *
>   * console_unlock(); may be called from any context.
>   */
> 
> 



-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/