[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA9D21B.3040906@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:10:35 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: mgorman@...e.de, npiggin@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
glommer@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu, avi@...hat.com,
len.brown@...el.com, dhowells@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
borislav.petkov@....com, yinghai@...nel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
cpw@....com, steiner@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
penberg@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, trenn@...e.de, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/tlb: add tlb flush all factor for specific
CPUs
>
> This uses x86_model without qualifying it x86 (family), however that is
> meaningless. All the CPUs you are dealing with above have c->x86 == 6,
> but you need to handle others correctly (even if that just means
> defaulting it to zero.)
>
> One way to do that is to do:
>
> switch ((c->x86 << 8) + c->x86_model) {
>
> ... and use numbers like 0x62d instead of 45.
Yes, this is better, thanks!
>
> -hpa
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists