[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120509133607.GA26124@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:36:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: Add %pb to print bitmaps
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> @@ -857,15 +860,19 @@ int kptr_restrict __read_mostly;
> * correctness of the format string and va_list arguments.
> * - 'K' For a kernel pointer that should be hidden from unprivileged users
> * - 'NF' For a netdev_features_t
> + * - 'b' For a bitmap, consumes 2 args, second is int
hm, won't the second arg confuse gcc's printf format checker?
> + case 'b':
> + {
> + int bits, len;
> +
> + switch (fmt[1]) {
> + case 'c':
> + bits = nr_cpumask_bits;
> + break;
> + case 'n':
> + bits = MAX_NUMNODES;
> + break;
> + default:
> + bits = va_arg(args, int);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + len = bitmap_scnlistprintf(buf, end - buf, ptr, bits);
also, if the second argument is not provided, could va_arg()
return noise or even NULL?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists