lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAA76E7.1070807@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:43 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
CC:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
	Shane Wang <shane.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/23] x86, realmode: Move reboot_32.S to unified realmode
 code

On 05/09/2012 05:37 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> It's true that it doesn't matter much but still it is a
> regression. And it doesn't cause any kind of overhead
> or bloat to fix this.
> 

However, the big thing is that we jump to the BIOS with caches off.  I
personally think it is the wrong thing to do (we don't jump to the real
reset vector anyway) but it is what has been tested for a long time.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ