[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAA76E7.1070807@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:43 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...el.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
Shane Wang <shane.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/23] x86, realmode: Move reboot_32.S to unified realmode
code
On 05/09/2012 05:37 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> It's true that it doesn't matter much but still it is a
> regression. And it doesn't cause any kind of overhead
> or bloat to fix this.
>
However, the big thing is that we jump to the BIOS with caches off. I
personally think it is the wrong thing to do (we don't jump to the real
reset vector anyway) but it is what has been tested for a long time.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists