linux-kernel - Re: vfs: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120509162854.GM22082@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 9 May 2012 17:28:54 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: vfs: INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 06:23:30PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:25:14PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've started seeing the following warning while fuzzing inside a KVM guest with the latest -next:
> > ? ? ? ?It's not a realistic attack, fortunately, since you need root
> > to get past open_exec() on any of those... ?Wait. ?How _did_ you get
> > past open_exec(), anyway? ?MAY_EXEC is not supposed to be granted on
> > anything that has no exec bits at all and AFAICS none of those files
> > have them.
> 
> You could chmod +x and run them, no?

Can't.  proc_setattr() will give you -EPERM and refuse to do anything
if you call it with ATTR_MODE in ->ia_valid.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/