[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAAD584.70102@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Date:	Wed, 09 May 2012 22:37:24 +0200
From:	Markus Franke <markus.franke@...02.tu-chemnitz.de>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
CC:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Markus Franke <markus.franke@...02.tu-chemnitz.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Add 1-wire slave device driver for DS28E04-100
Dear Evgeniy,
I have reworked the patch and now I am not getting any checkpatch
warnings or errors anymore.
How about the binary sysfs files? If I understand correctly I would add
a documentation file under Documentation/w1/slaves which documents both
sysfs files (eeprom & pio).
@Greg: Could you live with those driver specific binary sysfs files?
Best regards,
Markus Franke
Am 03.05.2012 20:00, schrieb Evgeniy Polyakov:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:21:34PM -0700, Greg KH (greg@...ah.com) wrote:
>>> Well, I just stuck to the way things are done in already existing
>>> drivers e.g. drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2433.c
>>
>> Really?  Ick, where are those files documented?
> 
> I'm kinda lost here.
> 
> To clarify things a bit - w1 allows to create 'private' sysfs files for
> special functionality which exists only in given driver - like
> enable/disable checksum and so on. It has to be documented and must
> follow common kernel codying standards of course.
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
