linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] allow to create a minix3fs with a blocksize != 1K

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FAAE9D9.40707@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 00:04:09 +0200
From:	Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko 
	<phcoder@...il.com>
To:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow to create a minix3fs with a blocksize != 1K

On 09.05.2012 23:57, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
> <phcoder@...il.com> wrote:
>> Have used it to test minixfs support with various block sizes.
>>
> Isn't this patch against disk-utils?
> Why are you sending it to linux-kernel@..?
Yes, I've already noticed this and resent it to the util-linux list.
Do you know if linux-kernel is the right list for my other patches like
wrong minixfs block allocation check or AFFS race condition? It seems
they've all been ignored.
I have few other bugfixes or feature improvements for lesser filesystems
but I don't want to send them unless I feel like the patches are going
to somewhere else than /dev/null.


-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (295 bytes)