[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205101026010.31253@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:31:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] HID: hid-multitouch: fix wrong protocol detection
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > well, the idea was to keep the memory footprint low. As these values
> > are only needed at init, then I freed them once I finished using them.
> > I can of course skip the pointer, but in that case, wouldn't the
> > struct declaration be worthless?
>
> My bad, I misread the placement of the free() statement. I was also
> concerned about memory, since HID is big enough a memory hog as it
> is. Barring the added complexity of this patch, it now makes more
> sense.
>
> Acked-by: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c: In function ‘mt_post_parse’:
drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c:673: error: invalid type argument of ‘->’ (have ‘unsigned int’)
make[1]: *** [drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.o] Error 1
I believe that
td->last_slot_field = f->usages[field_count_per_touch - 1]->hid;
should be
td->last_slot_field = f->usages[field_count_per_touch - 1];
but I leave this up to you guys to fix.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists