[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz-z6F=ynvTZp2xrSyq+Ar7huT92_S9e8Wuxepyppq5ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 17:00:16 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compat: Fix RT signal mask corruption via sigprocmask
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> compat_sys_sigprocmask reads a smaller signal mask from userspace than
> sigprogmask accepts for setting. So the high word of blocked.sig[0] will
> be cleared, releasing any potentially blocked RT signal.
I see what you're trying to do, but I think your patch is wrong.
It may work for SIG_BLOCK and SIG_SETMASK to use the current blocked
bits in the high bits, but I'm pretty sure it doesn't work at all for
SIG_UNBLOCK.
I suspect that compat_sys_sigprocmask() should simply be rewritten to
*not* use sys_sigprocmask() at all, but simply open-code the three
cases directly. IOW, copy the code from sys_sigprocmask(), and modify
it for an incoming/outgoing compat_old_sigset_t.
Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists