| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:54:53 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> CC: "w.sang@...gutronix.de" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>, "ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>, "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>, "olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling Jean, On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:49 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Adding support for protocol mangling I2C_M_NOSTART. > When multiple message transfer request made through i2c > and if any message is flagged with I2C_M_NOSTART then > it will not send the start/repeat start/address of that > message i.e. send the data directly. > Now the framework/core changes for making M_NOSTART as a separate flag is already part of your tree. So do I need to re-send the patch for having that change? 1/1 is already part of Wolfram's tree and so not sure that how do I go i.e. from where I take the base i2c-tegra driver. It may create the problem in integration on main if they are not sync. Also I have some couple of changes which will be on top of this. Thanks, Laxman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists