[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FABA585.7090600@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:54:53 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC: "w.sang@...gutronix.de" <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol
mangling
Jean,
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:49 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Adding support for protocol mangling I2C_M_NOSTART.
> When multiple message transfer request made through i2c
> and if any message is flagged with I2C_M_NOSTART then
> it will not send the start/repeat start/address of that
> message i.e. send the data directly.
>
Now the framework/core changes for making M_NOSTART as a separate flag
is already part of your tree.
So do I need to re-send the patch for having that change?
1/1 is already part of Wolfram's tree and so not sure that how do I go
i.e. from where I take the base i2c-tegra driver.
It may create the problem in integration on main if they are not sync.
Also I have some couple of changes which will be on top of this.
Thanks,
Laxman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists