linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/19] Introduce a led trigger for CPU activity and consolidate LED driver in ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 May 2012 21:25:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
cc:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	rpurdie@...ys.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
	tim.gardner@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/19] Introduce a led trigger for CPU activity and
 consolidate LED driver in ARM

On Thu, 10 May 2012, Bryan Wu wrote:

> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 09 May 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>> I'm the LEDs patchmonkey at present.  I can merge the drivers/leds
> >>>> change if you like, but there doesn't seem much point in that unless
> >>>> all the other patches get merged.
> >>>>
> >>>> So my preferred approach would be for the patch series to get merged
> >>>> via some ARM tree.
> >>>
> >>> I'm fine with taking it through arm-soc if that helps.
> >>
> >> That would be great to merge from arm-soc tree, thanks a lot, Arnd and Andrew.
> >
> > Ok, cool. Do you want to stage a branch in a git repo that we pull, or
> > do you prefer that we pick up the patches as posted? It's easier for
> > us to just do a pull but either way is fine.
> >
> 
> Great, I've already put in my kernel tree
> 
> Please find these patches here:
>       git://kernel.ubuntu.com/roc/linux-2.6/.git leds

You applied your patches on top of linux-next.  This can't be merged 
upstream until you rebase your patches on something stable such as pure 
v3.4-rc6 for example.


Nicolas