[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1336614484.1905.19.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:48:04 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] net: Add and use ether_addr_equal
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 21:21 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:56:44 -0700
>
> > Add a boolean function to test 2 ethernet addresses for equality
> > Convert compare_ether_addr uses to ether_addr_equal
>
> This series looks great, I'll apply all of it.
coccinelle is a nifty, better sed, tool. Thanks Julia et al.
> That case you didn't convert in mac80211 is probably the
> bug Johannes was talking about which started this whole
> discussion.
Looks like it.
Do you want a similar patch/patches for drivers/net?
If I break it out by nominal driver/maintainer,
it'll be a highish number of low density patches.
$ git grep -w compare_ether_addr drivers/net | wc -l
59
$ git grep -w -l compare_ether_addr drivers/net | wc -l
31
Maybe just a single patch?
Also the compare_ether_addr_64bits function is
still used a couple dozen times. Maybe another
patch for those? ether_addr_equal_64bits?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists