linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 12:29:41 -0400
From:	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void *

On 5/10/12 11:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:11:27AM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 09:47 AM, Nitin Gupta wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/10/12 10:02 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>> struct zs {
>>>>      void *ptr;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> And pass that structure around?
>>>>
>>>
>>> A minor problem is that we store this handle value in a radix tree node.
>>> If we wrap it as a struct, then we will not be able to store it directly
>>> in the node -- the node will have to point to a 'struct zs'. This will
>>> unnecessarily waste sizeof(void *) for every object stored.
>>
>>
>> I don't think so. You can use the fact that for a struct zs var,&var
>> and&var->ptr are the same.
>>
>> For the structure above:
>>
>> void * zs_to_void(struct zs *p) { return p->ptr; }
>> struct zs * void_to_zs(void *p) { return (struct zs *)p; }
>
> Do like what the rest of the kernel does and pass around *ptr and use
> container_of to get 'struct zs'.  Yes, they resolve to the same pointer
> right now, but you shouldn't "expect" to to be the same.
>
>

I think we can just use unsigned long as zs handle type since all we 
have to do is tell the user that the returned value is not a pointer. 
This will be less pretty than a typedef but still better than a single 
entry struct + container_of stuff.

Thanks,
Nitin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/