[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120510163033.GA10395@m.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 18:30:33 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: acme@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Caspar Zhang <czhang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/5] perf, tool: Fix endian issues
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:38:25PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:49:17PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> > On 5/7/12 5:29 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >Tested by running following usecase:
> > > - origin system:
> > > # perf record -a -- sleep 10 (any perf record will do)
> > > # perf report> report.origin
> > > # perf archive perf.data
> > >
> > > - copy the perf.data, report.origin and perf.data.tar.bz2
> > > to a target system and run:
> > > # tar xjvf perf.data.tar.bz2 -C ~/.debug
> > > # perf report> report.target
> > > # diff -u report.origin report.target
> > >
> > > - the diff should produce no output
> > > (besides some white space stuff and possibly different
> > > date/TZ output)
> > >
> > >Tested by above usecase cross following architectures:
> > > i386, x86_64, s390x, ppc64
> >
> > Short answer: Now that I have perf compiling in a 32-bit PPC VM,
> > applied the patchset and rebuilding -- it does not work for me.
>
> hi,
> Could I ask what VM did you use? My qemu setup does not seem
> to offer this one.
>
> so it's [32 bits big endian] into [64 bits small endian]
>
> I tested i386 to ppc64. The endianity is the other way round,
> I wonder whats wrong with your tested direction.
>
> hunting testing machine ;)
reproduced ;) working on fix
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists