linux-kernel - [ 34/52] KVM: s390: do store status after handling STOP_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120510173135.860774574@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:06 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jens Freimann <jfrei@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 34/52] KVM: s390: do store status after handling STOP_ON_STOP bit

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Jens Freimann <jfrei@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

(cherry picked from commit 9e0d5473e2f0ba2d2fe9dab9408edef3060b710e)

In handle_stop() handle the stop bit before doing the store status as
described for "Stop and Store Status" in the Principles of Operation.
We have to give up the local_int.lock before calling kvm store status
since it calls gmap_fault() which might sleep. Since local_int.lock
only protects local_int.* and not guest memory we can give up the lock.

Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <jfrei@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c |   20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c
@@ -133,13 +133,6 @@ static int handle_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *
 
 	vcpu->stat.exit_stop_request++;
 	spin_lock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
-	if (vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits & ACTION_STORE_ON_STOP) {
-		vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits &= ~ACTION_STORE_ON_STOP;
-		rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(vcpu,
-						  KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_NOADDR);
-		if (rc >= 0)
-			rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
 
 	if (vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits & ACTION_RELOADVCPU_ON_STOP) {
 		vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits &= ~ACTION_RELOADVCPU_ON_STOP;
@@ -155,7 +148,18 @@ static int handle_stop(struct kvm_vcpu *
 		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
+	if (vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits & ACTION_STORE_ON_STOP) {
+		vcpu->arch.local_int.action_bits &= ~ACTION_STORE_ON_STOP;
+		/* store status must be called unlocked. Since local_int.lock
+		 * only protects local_int.* and not guest memory we can give
+		 * up the lock here */
+		spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
+		rc = kvm_s390_vcpu_store_status(vcpu,
+						KVM_S390_STORE_STATUS_NOADDR);
+		if (rc >= 0)
+			rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	} else
+		spin_unlock_bh(&vcpu->arch.local_int.lock);
 	return rc;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/