linux-kernel - [ 44/52] KVM: lock slots_lock around device assignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120510173136.725265629@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:16 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 44/52] KVM: lock slots_lock around device assignment

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>

(cherry picked from commit 21a1416a1c945c5aeaeaf791b63c64926018eb77)

As pointed out by Jason Baron, when assigning a device to a guest
we first set the iommu domain pointer, which enables mapping
and unmapping of memory slots to the iommu.  This leaves a window
where this path is enabled, but we haven't synchronized the iommu
mappings to the existing memory slots.  Thus a slot being removed
at that point could send us down unexpected code paths removing
non-existent pinnings and iommu mappings.  Take the slots_lock
around creating the iommu domain and initial mappings as well as
around iommu teardown to avoid this race.

Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 virt/kvm/iommu.c |   23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/virt/kvm/iommu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/iommu.c
@@ -240,9 +240,13 @@ int kvm_iommu_map_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
 	kvm->arch.iommu_domain = iommu_domain_alloc(&pci_bus_type);
-	if (!kvm->arch.iommu_domain)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!kvm->arch.iommu_domain) {
+		r = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
 
 	if (!allow_unsafe_assigned_interrupts &&
 	    !iommu_domain_has_cap(kvm->arch.iommu_domain,
@@ -253,17 +257,16 @@ int kvm_iommu_map_guest(struct kvm *kvm)
 		       " module option.\n", __func__);
 		iommu_domain_free(kvm->arch.iommu_domain);
 		kvm->arch.iommu_domain = NULL;
-		return -EPERM;
+		r = -EPERM;
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
 	r = kvm_iommu_map_memslots(kvm);
 	if (r)
-		goto out_unmap;
-
-	return 0;
+		kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
 
-out_unmap:
-	kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
+out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -340,7 +343,11 @@ int kvm_iommu_unmap_guest(struct kvm *kv
 	if (!domain)
 		return 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
 	kvm_iommu_unmap_memslots(kvm);
+	kvm->arch.iommu_domain = NULL;
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
+
 	iommu_domain_free(domain);
 	return 0;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/