lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120510173136.027509589@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 10:32:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 36/52] KVM: Fix write protection race during dirty logging

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>

(cherry picked from commit 6dbf79e7164e9a86c1e466062c48498142ae6128)

This patch fixes a race introduced by:

  commit 95d4c16ce78cb6b7549a09159c409d52ddd18dae
  KVM: Optimize dirty logging by rmap_write_protect()

During protecting pages for dirty logging, other threads may also try
to protect a page in mmu_sync_children() or kvm_mmu_get_page().

In such a case, because get_dirty_log releases mmu_lock before flushing
TLB's, the following race condition can happen:

  A (get_dirty_log)     B (another thread)

  lock(mmu_lock)
  clear pte.w
  unlock(mmu_lock)
                        lock(mmu_lock)
                        pte.w is already cleared
                        unlock(mmu_lock)
                        skip TLB flush
                        return
  ...
  TLB flush

Though thread B assumes the page has already been protected when it
returns, the remaining TLB entry will break that assumption.

This patch fixes this problem by making get_dirty_log hold the mmu_lock
until it flushes the TLB's.

Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c |   11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2997,6 +2997,8 @@ static void write_protect_slot(struct kv
 			       unsigned long *dirty_bitmap,
 			       unsigned long nr_dirty_pages)
 {
+	spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
 	/* Not many dirty pages compared to # of shadow pages. */
 	if (nr_dirty_pages < kvm->arch.n_used_mmu_pages) {
 		unsigned long gfn_offset;
@@ -3004,16 +3006,13 @@ static void write_protect_slot(struct kv
 		for_each_set_bit(gfn_offset, dirty_bitmap, memslot->npages) {
 			unsigned long gfn = memslot->base_gfn + gfn_offset;
 
-			spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 			kvm_mmu_rmap_write_protect(kvm, gfn, memslot);
-			spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 		}
 		kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
-	} else {
-		spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	} else
 		kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(kvm, memslot->id);
-		spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-	}
+
+	spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 }
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ