lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAC0A9E.3020909@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:14 -0500
From:	Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>
To:	Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree

On 05/10/12 13:32, Ben Myers wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<bpm@....com>
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *);
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xfs_alloc_arg_t *,
>   		xfs_btree_cur_t *, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *, int *);
> -STATIC void xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *,
> -		xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *);
>
>   /*
>    * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur.
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ restart:
>    * args->minlen no suitable extent could be found, and the higher level
>    * code needs to force out the log and retry the allocation.
>    */
> -STATIC void
> +void
>   xfs_extent_busy_trim(
>   	struct xfs_alloc_arg	*args,
>   	xfs_agblock_t		bno,
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void
>   xfs_extent_busy_reuse(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno,
>   	xfs_agblock_t fbno, xfs_extlen_t flen, bool userdata);
>
> +void
> +xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno,
> +	xfs_extlen_t len, xfs_agblock_t *rbno, xfs_extlen_t *rlen);
> +
>   int
>   xfs_extent_busy_ag_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b);
>
>

Hmmm, I saw that before. I have been hand patching that to test.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@....com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ