[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP11UqAZgfWXUrxi7VsYr_hoDgi=cP4yn5UJ5rdPU8i5_sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 22:06:42 +0200
From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
William Douglas <william.douglas@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to
variable-length record buffer"
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 12:31 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> For me, next-20120508 prints nothing when booted, and I think also
>> hangs. To solve this, I reverted:
>>
>> 7ff9554 printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer
>>
>> In order to build, I also had to revert:
>>
>> c4e00da driver-core: extend dev_printk() to pass structured data
>>
>> Note: I'm running on an ARM system using a serial console, with
>> earlyprintk enabled.
>
> This issue still occurs in next-20120510.
>
> I've tracked it down to the assignment of msg->ts_nsec near the end of
> log_store(). If I comment this out, everything works. The problem is the
> assignment, not the call to local_clock():
>
> fails:
> msg->ts_nsec = local_clock();
> fails:
> msg->ts_nsec = 0;//local_clock();
> works:
> //msg->ts_nsec = local_clock();
Weird.
What happens if you change it to:
cpu_clock(logbuf_cpu);
?
If it works, the timestamps look ok?
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists