[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120510220304.GA10166@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:03:04 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, jrnieder@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, stephen.s.ko@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [ 33/52] net: Fix issue with netdev_tx_reset_queue not resetting
queue from XOFF state
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:51:20PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:35:49 -0700
>
> > On 05/10/2012 12:46 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >> David Miller wrote:
> >>> From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
> >>>> All of the changes in igb are unnecessary. I think they can be dropped
> >>>> from the patch as they have already been reverted from the latest
> >>>> net-next. The only change that is really needed is the piece in
> >>>> netdevice.h below.
> >>> Does it hurt? If not, just let it be.
> >> Based on the commit description for dad8a3b3eaa0 ("igb, ixgbe:
> >> netdev_tx_reset_queue incorrectly called from tx init path"), yes, it
> >> hurts. I don't know if it hurts enough to justify holding up this
> >> patch until dad8a3b3eaa0 hits mainline.
> >>
> >> | this sort of works in most cases except
> >> | when the number of real tx queues changes. When the number of real
> >> | tx queues changes netdev_tx_reset_queue() only gets called on the
> >> | new number of queues so when we reduce the number of queues we risk
> >> | triggering the watchdog timer and repeated device resets.
> >> |
> >> | So this is not only a cosmetic issue but causes real bugs. For
> >> | example enabling/disabling DCB or FCoE in ixgbe will trigger this.
> > I'm fairly certain we really shouldn't make the changes to igb. I would
> > say to just modify the existing patch by just dropping the igb portion
> > of it and it would be fine.
>
> Ok, Greg, could you do me a huge favor and simply trim the IGB driver
> changes from this patch and just keep the linux/netdevice.h part?
Now done, thanks for letting me know.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists