[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAB38ED.5050200@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 11:41:33 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@...dia.com>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"'David Rientjes'" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Make nr_uninterruptible count a signed value
On 05/09/2012 04:11 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 15:46 -0700, Diwakar Tundlam wrote:
>> Maybe it is an artifact of 32-bit machine displaying 64-bit print format.
>> An (unsigned long)(-24) promoted to (signed long long) ends up as 4294967272.
>> As seen in my output of sched_debug.
>
> Ah, quite possible. %Ld is indeed %lld and the value is long, not long
> long. So the proper fix is to fudge that printk statement somehow.
Could we use SEQ_printf for nr_uninterruptible, just like we did on
rq->load.weight?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>> Your machine is probably natively 64-bit.
>
> Yeah, I gave up on 32bit computing a while ago..
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists