[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FAC6462.1070904@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:59:14 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, jeremy@...p.org, borislav.petkov@....com,
riel@...hat.com, luto@....edu, avi@...hat.com, len.brown@...el.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
cpw@....com, steiner@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
penberg@...nel.org, hughd@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, trenn@...e.de, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] x86/tlb: add tlb_flushall_factor into sysfs for
user testing/tuning
> Nowhere do you say this is x86 only, please fix that.
sure.
>
> Yeah, another tunable that no one knows how to use.
>
> Really, why is this here at all? As others pointed out, this really
> looks like a debugging thing that almost no one will ever need, so
> please, put it in debugfs.
Ok.
>
>
> Do the #ifdef in the .h file, not the .c file please, no matter how you
> end up doing this (debugfs vs. sysfs.)
Ok.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists